T.E.N. Accepting Nominations for the 2015 Information Security Executive

ATLANTA, GA (PRWEB) April 06, 2015

T.E.N., an information technology and security executive networking and relationship-marketing firm, announced today that nominations will be accepted April 6, 2015 through June 5, 2015 for the 2015 Information Security Executive® (ISE®) West Awards.

Awards include the Information Security Executive® of the Year, which recognizes executives who have made a positive impact on their organizations through risk management, data-asset protection, regulatory compliance, privacy and information security; and the ISE® Project of the Year, which recognizes a project completed during the previous 12-18 months that has had a significant impact on an organization’s risk management or information security posture. Eligible nominees meet all appropriate criteria and are based in the U.S. West territory, which includes Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington and Wyoming.

Executives and/or project teams can be self-nominated in addition to entries by supervisors, employees, peers or technology partners. Anyone interested in nominating for the ISE® West Awards may download the forms here. All nominations are sent to T.E.N.’s distinguished panel of ISE® Judges for review and scoring.

“The West coast is home to many of the nation’s most innovative companies and forward thinking leaders,” said T.E.N. CEO & President Marci McCarthy. “We encourage executives and their teams to consider their work over the past 12-18 months and take advantage of this opportunity to benchmark against other high-caliber security programs in the region.”

Nominees, finalists and winners will be recognized at the ISE® West Executive Forum and Awards on August 20, 2015 at the Westin St. Francis in San Francisco, CA. The Executive Forum will include keynote speakers, interactive roundtables moderated by the CISOs and VPs of participating companies and engaging panel discussions. Finalists and winners in both categories are announced at the awards gala that evening and recognized through press coverage and inclusion on the T.E.N. and ISE® websites. Organizations taking part in previous programs have included leading organizations, such as BlackLine Systems, Caesar’s Entertainment, St. Joseph’s Health and the Warner Bros. Entertainment.

About T.E.N.

T.E.N., a national technology and security executive networking organization, facilitates peer-to-peer relationships between top executives, industry visionaries and solutions providers. Nominated for numerous industry awards, T.E.N.’s executive leadership programs enable information exchange, collaboration and decision-making. Its flagship program, the nationally-acclaimed Information Security Executive® (ISE®) of the Year Program Series and Awards, is North America’s largest leadership recognition and networking program for security professionals. Other offerings include The ISE® Lions’ Den and Jungle Lounge, T.E.N. Custom Programs and the ISE® Industry Expert Advisory Services, empowering IT solutions providers to gain access to highly credentialed IT business veterans’ expertise. For information, visit http://www.ten-inc.com.

About ISE® Award Program Series

For more than a decade, the Information Security Executive® (ISE®) of the Year Award Program Series has empowered security executives and their project teams to Connect, Collaborate and Celebrate. Recognized as the industry’s most prestigious IT Security award program, it has become the most anticipated award program for security executives and their project teams. Winners have included executives and project teams from leading organizations such as Nike, The Walt Disney Company, the United States Postal Service, Schlumberger, Texas Instruments, JPMorgan Chase & Co., Equifax, Comcast, PayPal, Northrop Grumman Corporation, and Nationwide.

Our distinguished ISE® Judges are past nominees representing a cross section of industries, including commercial, government, health care and academic sectors. For this reason, the ISE® Awards represent the best achievements of the year as evaluated by those regarded as the industry’s most influential and successful thought leaders. Coupled with a one or two-day executive summit, the ISE® Awards are held across the country and Canada in major cities including Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas, New York and San Francisco. The ISE® Awards Program Series has reached more than 10,000 executives across a broad range of industries and has been a major influence in executives’ careers, knowledge sharing, and the development of peer-to-peer relationships.

Find More Relationship Canada United States Press Releases

U.S. Militarization of Foreign Policy Leads to Statecraft Casualties According to New Book from American University School of International Service Professors

Washington, DC (PRWEB) March 24, 2015

More money is needed to effectively carry out the U.S. diplomatic mission overseas, according to Secretary of State John Kerry. He testified, in late February, during a Senate Foreign Relations Committee saying a mere one percent of the total U.S. budget supports everything the Department of State does abroad and it’s not enough. According to Kerry, it begs the question: Why don’t the Department of State and other civilian authorities like the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) have the budget necessary to carry out their missions?

American University School of International Service professors Gordon Adams and Shoon Murray, co-editors of Mission Creep: The Militarization of US Foreign Policy? (Georgetown University Press, 2015), and the experts they assembled G. William Anderson, Brian E. Carlson, Charles B. Cushman, Jr., James F. Dobbins, Jennifer Kibbe, Edward Marks, Anthony Quainton, Derek S. Reveron, Nina M. Serafino, Connie Veillette, and Sharon Weiner say as the title of the book states a preference for the Pentagon to take on the roles once reserved for civilian authorities. The contributors trace the various factors leading to the militarization of U.S. foreign policy over the last 70 years.

The authors examine the post-World War II trend in three parts: the institutional and political context, observing the militarization trend (in the areas of development, security assistance, public diplomacy, traditional diplomacy, intelligence, and policy advice), and the implications of militarization. Throughout recommendations are made on how to stem mission creep and potentially reverse it.

The Birth of a Trend.

Adams and Murray identify the Cold War as the start of the shift when the National Security Act of 1947, Truman Doctrine, and the establishment of NATO all began to shift the leadership of American foreign policy from State to Defense. As the DoD budget and capabilities grew, the trend accelerated. “The 9/11 terrorist attacks were a real game changer because the White House and Congress became consumed with counter-terrorism efforts that led to the twin wars in Afghanistan and Iraq,” says Shoon Murray.

Conventional warfare gave way to insurgency after 2001. U.S. intervention in the Balkans that had distributed responsibility between the State Department for reconstruction and governance and DoD to carry out military operations was abandoned as James F. Dobbins points out given the new insurgency paradigm. “The button downed U.S. diplomat has given way to a US military uniform in the eyes of the international community,” says Adams.

2005 A Defining Year

In 2005, DoD began to incorporate nation building into its mission. Adams, Murray, and several of the contributors point to the 2005 DoD Directive 3000.05 that included stability operations as a core U.S. military mission. “It is a remarkable development that the Pentagon would give marching orders for the services and commands to consider noncombat tasks on par with war fighting,” write Adams and Murray.

At a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing back in 2008, where Adams testified, he pointed out that the Pentagon’s share of funding for overseas security assistance – traditionally a State Department responsibility budget just for U.S. development assistance– increased from 5.6 percent to 21.7 percent or $ 5.5 billion from 2002 to 2005.

Is It A Mission the Military Wants? Maybe.

Several of the chapter contributors question whether the military actually wants the additional portfolios added to its core mission. What stands out is the reluctance of U.S. military leaders to remain responsible for development and humanitarian missions better suited to civilian agencies. For example, in 2008, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates said, “America’s civilian institutions of diplomacy and development have been chronically undermanned and underfunded for too long—relative to what we traditionally spend on the military.” The concern was echoed by Admiral Mike Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff when he said the political leadership views the military as more capable, assigning it more noncombat missions, and further weakening civilian agencies. He wanted “to break this cycle”.

However, the Special Operations Command (SOCOM) seems to relish the expanded role. SOCOM’s responsibility to lead and synchronize the global war on terror has sometimes conflicted with U.S. civilian authorities abroad. School of International Service diplomat in residence Anthony Quainton and Murray in one of the chapters spoke to two dozen retired U.S. ambassadors in the course of their research about whether in their postings they experienced any conflicts with DoD operations. The answer was largely no with one exception. “Many of the ambassadors we spoke with,” write Murray and Quainton, “were suspicious of SOCOM, perceiving SOF (Special Operations Forces) as more free-wheeling and less deferential to ambassadorial authority.” One former ambassador quoted in the book said SOCOM was secretive making it tricky for US ambassadors to represent U.S. interests when secret missions even to the ambassador were being carried out.

Mission Creep by the Numbers

Adams, who served as the associate director for national security and international affairs at the White House Office of Management and Budget during the Clinton administration, runs through several figures demonstrating the militarization of foreign policy. For example, the Pentagon budget is more than 10 times as large as the nation’s international affairs spending, and there are 215 uniformed military personnel for every Foreign Service officer.

Adams is concerned that the asymmetry could lead to “blowback”. “On the one hand it’s funny that there are more musicians in DoD bands than in the entire foreign service, but on the other hand the militarization has consequences,” says Adams, “For decades the United States has advised well-endowed and powerful militaries in less developed countries to remove themselves from politics, social work, and the local economy, but today the expansion of the U.S. military into noncore missions sends a conflicting message to these militaries. If the U.S. military can be an investor, government adviser, developer, why not them?”

Many of the contributors concede that projects once squarely in the domain of civilian authorities like the State Department and USAID will continue to be executed by the U.S. military. But should the nation’s military, the point of the spear, be digging wells, constructing schools and providing medical assistance or advising national and local governments on governance and the rule of law? The majority of authors seem to agree it’s better suited for USAID and the State Department to do the humanitarian and state building work on the ground even if it means some soiled hands.

More US Foreign Policy Press Releases

Four Victims Of Alleged Sexual Abuse File Civil Lawsuit Against The American Youth Soccer Organization

Torrance, CA (PRWEB) March 10, 2015

Attorney Paul Mones and Attorney Irwin Zalkin announced the filing of a civil lawsuit for alleged sexual abuse on Tuesday against the American Youth Soccer Organization (“AYSO”), a registered California not-for-profit corporation with its national offices located in the city of Torrance, California.

The lawsuit (Case No.BC 574025) has been filed on behalf of four unnamed Plaintiffs (John Does, 1-4) who were minors when the alleged sexual abuse occurred. The complaint was filed this morning in the Los Angeles Superior Court.

According to the civil complaint, the four Plaintiffs, three of whom are adults now and one who is a minor were all allegedly sexually abused by Renoir Valenti, who came in contact with them as a commissioner, youth soccer coach and/or referee in the AYSO. The complaint alleges that Valenti sexually abused and molested the plaintiffs on multiple occasions. The complaint also alleges that AYSO had a duty to protect the Plaintiffs and knew or should have known that Valenti was a danger to children in his care.

The complaint further alleges that Valenti’s behavior and actions violated AYSO policies intended to protect children. The four Plaintiffs were all minor children at the time of the abuse alleged in the complaint. The abuse alleged in the complaint occurred to the various Plaintiffs during the period 1996 through 2012.

About Paul Mones

For over thirty years Paul Mones has dedicated his legal practice to protecting victims of child abuse. The focus of his work is representing victims of sexual abuse against the institutions in which the children were sexually molested. These efforts have included lawsuits around the nation against the Boy Scouts of America, the Catholic Church, private and public schools and other youth-serving organizations throughout the United States. http://www.paulmones.com

About The Zalkin Law Firm

With offices in San Diego and New York, the firm’s lawyers have represented hundreds of survivors of childhood sexual abuse and achieved groundbreaking results in numerous high-profile clergy abuse cases across the United States. The Zalkin Law Firm has aggressively represented survivors who suffered child sexual abuse and sexual assault while members of religious and other organizations, including the Catholic Church, foster care, Boy Scouts, recovery homes, foreign student exchange programs, colleges and the Jehovah’s Witnesses. The firm has negotiated over $ 200 million in settlements for victims in Catholic clergy alleged sex abuse cases. http://www.zalkin.com.

Related Foreign Policy Press Releases

US Federal Contractor Registration: Robert F. Audet, Inc Wins Over $470,000 in Government Contracts Thanks to Simplified Acquisition Program

Washington D.C. (PRWEB) February 28, 2015

Robert F. Audet, Inc enrolled in the Simplified Acquisition Program in January 2013, and as a result won 6 federal contracts totaling $ 479,184. Tammy Helgren of US Federal Contractor Registration suggested that the Simplified Acquisition Program would be the best government-marketing program for their business model based on their business goals. Robert F. Audet, Inc has managed to become extremely successful in the federal marketplace from a direct result of the Simplified Acquisition Program. The Simplified Acquisition Program has proven to be the most efficient government-marketing program in 2014. US Federal Contractor Registration, the world’s largest third party registration firm developed the Simplified Acquisition Program in an effort to help small businesses win simplified acquisition contracts.

Below is a contract awarded from the Department of the Army to Robert F. Audet, Inc as found on the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS):

Vendor Name: ROBERT F. AUDET, INC.    

Contracting Agency: DEPT OF THE ARMY

Date Signed: November 06, 2013    

Action Obligation: $ 319,500

Contracting Office: W2SD ENDIST NEW ENGLAND



Vendor City: EAST GREENWICH    

Vendor DUNS: 620823930

Vendor State: RI    

Vendor ZIP: 028181422

About Robert F. Audet, Inc

Robert F. Audet, Inc. was incorporated in the state of Rhode Island in 1990. Their focus is technically complex electrical installations. They perform all phases of commercial, industrial and governmental electrical work: Medium voltage, low voltage, and systems – including fire alarm, security, and telecommunications. They have an in-house team of certified medium voltage splicers. All of their electricians are licensed, some holding more than one license. Their electricians hold certificates in many other disciplines needed in their work, i.e. lift licenses, CPR site aid, confined space, etc. All employees are OSHA 10 qualified. Their company is a member of Associated Builders and Contractors.

Robert F. Audet, Inc Vendor Profile

DUNS: 620823930


Active in SAM; Registration valid until 1/31/201

Small Business

North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Codes:

238210 – Electrical Contractors and Other Wiring Installation Contractors

Federal Purchasing officers looking for information on Robert F. Audet, Inc please call Laura Ley at (401) 884-3310 or visit their Federally formatted website at http://www.rfaudetgov.com/.

Tammy Hellgren can be reached at 1(877) 252-2700 Ext 718 to discuss Simplified Acquisition Program enrollment for both federally registered and unregistered businesses. US Federal Contractor Registration is the only firm allowed to qualify and maintain the simplified acquisition program. For businesses interested in learning more please visit http://www.SimplifiedAcquisitionProgram.org.

Find More US Department Of State Press Releases

PIP Auto Insurance Quotes Now Searchable by Zip Code at National Insurer Portal

Dayton, OH (PRWEB) February 16, 2015

Information collection is one negative for auto owners who request quotations for insurance coverage through American providers. Because some companies require information in exchange for a policy quote, the Insurance Pros company has modified its search tools online. All PIP auto insurance quotes are now searchable with a zip code at http://insuranceprosusa.com/auto-insurance.html.

The upgrade now makes it easier to use one of the easiest pieces of information to receive an immediate quotation for vehicle insurance coverage. Because zip code information can be useful to insurers, drivers who use the revised search tool can be presented with a more organized listing of quote providers of personal insurance coverage this year.

“The PIP coverage agencies that are viewable while using our updated research system are all located inside the U.S. and underwrite coverage for vehicle owners,” said an Insurance Pros rep.

The precise packages for coverage that can be located with help from the Insurance Pros company search tool are in no way limited to basic protection. All major makes of vehicles as well as foreign models can be covered by policies that are located with assistance from the search tool in 2015.

“There are no vehicle requirements or specific personal information that must be entered into our system in order to begin selecting the companies providing state rates,” said the rep.

The Insurance Pros USA company is also providing research assistance to motorcycle users. The system found at http://insuranceprosusa.com/motorcycle-insurance.html can be a helpful tool to use when exploring quotes for bike insurance on a national level in all states.

About InsuranceProsUSA.com

The InsuranceProsUSA.com company has updated the way that motorists seek out providers of insurance coverage on its website. The worn out methods of contacting companies by phone or by mail have been replaced with a zip code submission system. The InsuranceProsUSA.com company organizes the different agencies by location in the U.S. as a way of simplifying the search patterns by consumers who use its rates and policy finder tools.

Latest Foreign Policy Of The United States News

Sustaining Ambition in the US-India Relationship
The United States can and should continue to help to broker India's distinct global role, even as it presses New Delhi to resolve difficult issues such as intellectual property rights, foreign direct investment (FDI) caps, and trade restrictions that …
Read more on Foreign Policy (blog)

Iran Is Trying to Shield Assad From Chemical Weapons …
He has also moderated public discussions on foreign policy, including interviews with Susan E. Rice, the U.S. National Security Advisor, Gerard Araud, France's U.N. ambassador, and other senior diplomatic leaders. Born in Los Angeles, California, Lynch …
Read more on Foreign Policy (blog)

2014 Global Go To Think Tank Index Released

Philadelphia, PA (PRWEB) January 23, 2015

The Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program (TTCSP) at the University of Pennsylvania today released its 2014 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report, the most comprehensive ranking of the world’s top think tanks. Simultaneous launch events were held by 81 organizations across 62 cities in 51 countries worldwide. The report will be translated into more than 20 languages.

As the premier database and measure of world think tanks, the Go To Index aims to increase the profile, performance and impact of think tanks, and to create a transnational and interdisciplinary network of centers of public policy excellence.

“In a world filled with tweets and sound bites that are often superficial and politically charged, it is critical to know where to turn for sound policy proposals that address our complex policy issues,” said James McGann, PhD, director of the University of Pennsylvania’s Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program. “This independent Index is designed to help identify and recognize the leading centers of excellence in public policy research around the world.”

The launch of the 2014 Go To Index in Washington D.C. was hosted by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). A discussion was held about the challenges and opportunities for defense policy think tanks in the coming year. An afternoon session at the United Nations Headquarters in New York City focused on the connections between inter-governmental organizations and think tanks. The Index was also distributed through a network of global partners, giving institutions a chance to highlight the crucial role they play in building and maintaining civil society in their countries and regions.

The annual report, compiled with assistance from more than 1,500 peer institutions and experts from the print and electronic media, academia, public and private donor institutions, and governments around the world, ranks the top 150 global think tanks across four general categories:

1. Top Think Tanks in the World

2. Top Think Tanks by Region

3. Top Think Tanks by Area of Research

4. Top Think Tanks by Special Achievement

This year’s report also includes new Global Health and Domestic Health categories as well as a Global Trends feature, a detailed analysis of the biggest developments and challenges that think tanks have faced and will continue to face in the near future.

The Brookings Institution ranked first on the Global Think Tank list for the seventh consecutive year. The index report can be found at http://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1008&context=think_tanks.

Below are highlights of the 2014 rankings:

Top Think Tanks Worldwide (U.S. and non-U.S.)

    Brookings Institution (United States)
    Chatham House (United Kingdom)
    Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (United States)
    Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) (United States)
    Bruegel (Belgium)

Top Defense and National Security Think Tanks

    Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) (United States)
    RAND Corporation (United States)
    International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) (United Kingdom)
    Brookings Institution (United States)
    Chatham House (United Kingdom)

Top Foreign Policy and International Affairs Think Tanks

    Brookings Institution (United States)
    Chatham House (United Kingdom)
    Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (United States)
    Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) (United States)
    Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) (United States)

The following regional launch partners will be hosting events in 62 cities around the world:

Sub-Saharan Africa

    African Capacity Building Foundation (ACBF), Harare, Zimbabwe
    African Economic Research Consortium (AERC), Nairobi, Kenya
    Center for Policy Studies (CERPS), Monrovia, Liberia
    Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa (CODESRIA), Dakar, Senegal
    Development Research and Projects Centre (dRPC), Kano, Nigeria
    Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA), Accra, Ghana
    Mapungubwe Institute for Strategic Reflection (MISTRA), Johannesburg, South Africa
    Nigerian Institute of International Affairs (NIIA), Lagos, Nigeria
    REPOA, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
    United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (ECA), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Asia and the Pacific

    Australian Institute of International Affairs (AIIA), Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI), and Strategic and Defence Studies Centre (SDCS) Canberra, Australia
    Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS), Dhaka, Bangladesh
    Center for Economic and Social Development (CESD), Baku, Azerbaijan
    Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), Jakarta, Indonesia
    Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies at Renmin University of China (RDCY), Development Research Center of the State Council (DRC), and China Center for

International Economic Exchanges (CCIEE) (TBC), Beijing, China

    Chula Global Network, Chulalongkorn University, and International Institute for Trade and Development (ITD), Bangkok, Thailand
    Gateway House: Indian Council on Global Relations, Mumbai, India
    Japan Institute of International Affairs (JIIA) and Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI), Tokyo, Japan
    Korea Institute for International Economic Policy (KIEP), East Asia Institute (EAI), and Korea Economic Magazine, Seoul, South Korea
    Observer Research Foundation (ORF), New Delhi, India
    Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences (SASS), Shanghai, China
    Singapore Institute of International Affairs (SIIA), Singapore
    Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI), Islamabad, Pakistan

Latin America

    Argentine Council for International Relations (CARI), Buenos Aires, Argentina
    CEDICE Libertad, Caracas, Venezuela
    Centro de Estudios Públicos (CEP), Santiago, Chile
    Ethos Public Policy Lab, Mexico City, Mexico
    Getulio Vargas Foundation (FGV), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
    Global Foundation for Democracy and Development (FUNGLODE), Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
    Group for the Analysis of Development (GRADE), Lima, Peru


    Adam Smith Institute (ASI), London, United Kingdom
    Barcelona Centre for International Affairs (CIDOB) and Fundación Alternativas, Barcelona, Spain
    Carnegie Moscow Center, Moscow, Russia
    Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS), Copenhagen, Denmark
    Ecologic Institute, Konrad Adenauer Stiftung (KAS), and Friedrich Ebert Stiftung (FES), Berlin, Germany
    EUROPEUM Institute for European Policy, Prague, Czech Republic
    Fundación Alternativas, Madrid, Spain
    Institute for International Political Studies (ISPI), Milan, Italy
    Institute of International and Strategic Relations (IRIS), Paris, France
    Institute of World Economics, Budapest, Hungary
    Polish Institute of International Affairs (PISM), Warsaw, Poland
    Populari, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Razumkov Centre, Kiev, Ukraine

North America

    Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), Washington D.C., United States
    Chicago Council on Global Affairs, Chicago, United States
    Fraser Institute, Vancouver, Canada
    Institute for Research on Public Policy (IRPP), Montreal, Canada
    James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy, Houston, United States
    United Nations, Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs, UN Regional Commissions New York Office (RCNYO), and International Peace Institute (IPI) New York, United States
    University of Pennsylvania, Lauder Institute, Perry World House, Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program, and Foreign Policy Research Institute (FPRI), Philadelphia, United States

Middle East and North Africa

    Al Jazeera Center for Studies (AJCS), Doha, Qatar
    Association for Liberal Thinking (ALT), Ankara, Turkey
    Center for Strategic Studies (CSS), Amman, Jordan
    Egyptian Council for Foreign Affairs (ECFA), Cairo, Egypt
    Friedrich Ebert Stiftung (FES), Istanbul, Turkey
    Institute for National Security Studies (INSS), Tel Aviv, Israel
    International Strategic Research Organization (USAK), Istanbul and Ankara, Turkey
    OCP Policy Center, Rabat, Morocco
    Regional Center for Strategic Studies (RCSS), Cairo, Egypt

About Penn’s Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program (TTCSP):

The Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program (TTCSP) at the International Relations Program, University of Pennsylvania, conducts research on the role policy institutes play in governments and civil societies around the world. TTCSP was established in 1989. The Program maintains a database and network of more than 6,600 think tanks in 152 countries. Often referred to as the “think tanks’ think tank,” TTCSP examines the evolving role and character of public policy research organizations. The Index is supported by Penn’s School of Arts & Sciences, global.upenn.edu and the Lauder Institute at the Wharton School.

What are our constraints in use of government?

What are our constraints in use of government?
Murray notes that there are often trade-offs between the categories, especially with public policy. What if government policy makes a modest gain in one area but at the expense of other goals? For example, the government might provide material support …
Read more on News Sentinel

Congress set to protest against government's move to make key policy changes
The Congress had termed the ordinance to amend the UPA government's Land Acquisition Act as "antifarmer". While state chiefs have been asked to prepare their units for state-, district-and block-level agitations, all serving and former Congress chief …
Read more on Economic Times

Transparency is a Pro-Government Policy
But the government's reliance on secrecy raised doubts about the wisdom and morality of policies that might well have been more solidly supported had the issues been fully aired in debate. What secrecy grants in the short run-public support for …
Read more on Reason (blog)

Mining, Oil & Gas Machinery Manufacturing in Canada in Canada Industry Market Research Report from IBISWorld Has Been Updated

New York, NY (PRWEB) December 20, 2014

Canada is one of the world’s largest energy producers, and the country’s standing in global energy markets has greatly benefited the Mining, Oil and Gas Machinery Manufacturing industry. The mining sector in Canada is significant; however the growing oil and gas sectors are the primary drivers industry performance. Vast oil and gas reserves in Canada have become increasingly economical as technology has improved. In addition, industry operators, along with their downstream counterparts, are heavily investing in research and development to develop equipment that is economical, safe and effective to extract unconventional resources. However, the industry is at the mercy of both global commodity markets and regulators, as demand is largely driven by oil and gas production. Consequently, industry revenue has grown in the five years to 2014. Nevertheless, revenue is anticipated to fall in 2014, as downstream operators’ surge of investment in 2011 have satiated demand for new machinery during the period, and falling oil and gas prices in 2014 have curtailed exploration and production projects.

Greater investment in unconventional oil and gas deposits will bolster industry performance over the next five years. IBISWorld Economic Analyst James Crompton says in the updated report “participation of international oil companies in Canada’s oil and gas sector will drive demand for industry products, as foreign operators have been investing in Canada, most notably in Alberta, to gain expertise in unconventional extraction techniques.” This trend will persist in the five years to 2019, despite regulatory hurdles for downstream operators. IBISWorld expects that industry revenue will expand in the five years to 2019. The environmental impact of unconventional oil and gas extraction techniques, which require the use of this industry’s products, has been widely debated, and this debate is expected to continue through the five years to 2019.

While the industry’s downstream customers encounter an array of challenges on a yearly basis, this industry will experience less volatility due to the high level of demand for its products over the next five years. “There are no substitutes for industry products, which has benefited the industry’s operators in the form of healthy profit margins,” Crompton says in the updated report. IBISWorld anticipates investment in the industry will continue to be strong.

For more information, visit IBISWorld’s Mining, Oil & Gas Machinery Manufacturing in Canada industry report page.

Follow IBISWorld on Twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/IBISWorld

Friend IBISWorld on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/IBISWorld/121347533189

IBISWorld industry Report Key Topics

This industry manufactures oil and gas field equipment and underground mining machinery. Products include rotary and portable drilling rigs and parts; crushing, pulverizing, screening and mineral processing machinery; and derricks, substructures and related accessories. The following are excluded: machinery with dual construction and mining uses; conveyors for coal and ore; underground mining locomotives; and offshore drilling production platforms.

Industry Performance

Executive Summary

Key External Drivers

Current Performance

Industry Outlook

Industry Life Cycle

Products & Markets

Supply Chain

Products & Services

Major Markets

Globalization & Trade

Business Locations

Competitive Landscape

Market Share Concentration

Key Success Factors

Cost Structure Benchmarks

Barriers to Entry

Major Companies

Operating Conditions

Capital Intensity

Key Statistics

Industry Data

Annual Change

Key Ratios

About IBISWorld Inc.

Recognized as the nation’s most trusted independent source of industry and market research, IBISWorld offers a comprehensive database of unique information and analysis on every US and Canadian industry. With an extensive online portfolio, valued for its depth and scope, the company equips clients with the insight necessary to make better business decisions. Headquartered in Los Angeles, IBISWorld serves a range of business, professional service and government organizations through more than 10 locations worldwide. For more information, visit http://www.ibisworld.com or call 1-800-330-3772.

Find More Foreign Relations Of Canada Press Releases


USA relations eBay auctions you should keep an eye on:


$6.99 (1 Bid)
End Date: Sunday Apr-19-2015 17:15:15 PDT
Bid now | Add to watch list

1909 1st American Inland Waterways Their Relation to Railway Transportation USA
End Date: Sunday May-17-2015 8:10:26 PDT
Buy It Now for only: $17.99
Buy It Now | Add to watch list

Check out this illuminating Polymer Bank Note infographic from the Bank of Canada:

Thursday, July 18, 2013

Canada's New $50 and $100 'Indestructible' Bills Can Melt

In Nov. 2012 and earlier this year, the Bank of Canada released new $50 and $100 Canadian bills.  The key differences:  These bills are forged from polymers, not paper.  (I, foolishly, assumed polymer was just fancy code for plastic--but was wrong.)

But now in circulation, some Canadians are finding one flaw with these super tough, environmentally friendly bills.  

From TheStar.com:
Under certain conditions they will curl up like bacon in a frying pan.
“The Bank of Canada cannot rule out that polymer notes may be damaged under certain extraordinary conditions,” Julie Girard, a currency spokesperson for the Bank of Canada, told the Star Thursday.
According to various reports, the so-called indestructible polymer bills will shrink under intense heat, be it the inside of a car or placed next to a heat source.
The new $100 bills cost 19 cents each to produce — almost twice that of paper bills — but are said to last 2.5 times longer, or about 19 years, than the paper cousin and are resistant to tearing and water damage. The new bills also have hidden security features, including transparent holograms, making them difficult to counterfeit.
Check out this illuminating Polymer Bank Note infographic from the Bank of Canada:

Tuesday, July 9, 2013

What...My Verizon Phone Will Work on Both Sides of the Canada-U.S. Border? Verizon May Enter the Canadian Marketplace, Ending One of the Most Recognizable Canada-U.S. Digital Border Barriers

One of the most recognizable Canada-U.S. border barriers may soon fall.

So, are you one of the many cross-border travelers who detests either (a) having two phones or (b) adjusting to life without your Verizon cell phone?

Well, your stress may soon be over. (Oh, also, Canadians may see more options for watching NHL and NFL games.)

From Michael Geist TheStar.com:
Reports that U.S. telecom giant Verizon may be preparing to enter the Canadian market has sparked considerable speculation on the likely impact of a company with a market cap greater than Bell, Rogers, and Telus combined. While much of the discussion has centered on wireless pricing, the more significant development may be the shift toward a single North American communications market.


The prospect of a Verizon entry into Canada would put a single communications market into overdrive. On the telecom side, Verizon could use its Canadian network to change the approach to roaming in North America altogether, since it would be uniquely positioned to offer a single U.S. and Canadian network. 
The company could move to eliminate roaming fees for U.S. and Canadian customers, while offering cost-competitive U.S. and Canadian roaming together for international providers establishing wholesale roaming agreements. Such a plan would obviously be attractive to the corporate sector as well as regular cross-border travellers, leading to the gradual elimination of roaming and long distance charges for calls throughout North America.

On the broadcasting side, Verizon holds exclusive U.S. rights to both the National Football League and the National Hockey League. Those rights are currently held by BCE in Canada, but a Verizon entry into Canada could shake things up. Verizon could presumably complicate the BCE rights by offering free access to NFL and NHL games to Canadian customers when they travel to the U.S. More interestingly, it could make a play for joint U.S.-Canada rights in the future, moving closer to an elimination of the geographic divide on content rights.


With satellite radio and Internet video already close to a single market, regulatory reform to longstanding policies such as simultaneous substitution a possibility, and the geographic lines on telecom, content, and broadcast distribution all increasingly blurred, the big question may be whether Canada is closing in on a common North American communications market.

Friday, June 28, 2013

RIP RIM's Blackberry Playbook; Update on RIM's Non-Demise Demise

By Keith Edmund White

Canada's tech-juggernaut, Research in Motion ("RIM"), now trading as Blackberry, is still adapting to the new world of mobile devices, but its still on path to release a new generations of devices--which can hopefully return this company to premier status.

(Check out Justin McNeil 2012 post The Decline and Fall of the Blackberry Empire.)

First, WSJ reports on Blackberry's 1st quarter loss (and likely 2nd quarter loss), because of Venezuelan foreign currency restrictions.  

(Learn more about Venezuela's long-standing currency issues in this handy Economist article.)

And, yes, Blackberry continues to lose subscribers, but it has the cash to push out its new generation of phones.

But, even when Blackberry does stuff right, that doesn't mean success in this heavily competitive global marketplace for mobile devices.

From Lance Ulanoff's excellent op-ed in today's Mashable, Blackberry PlayBook Is as Good as Dead:

Today, BlackBerry (the company formerly known as RIM) essentially put a nail in the PlayBook coffin by announcing that it would not be converted to the new Blackberry 10 OS. That mobile OS is clearly the future of the company. QNX, though, bought and now developed by BlackBerry, is the past. 
In a Q1 2014 earnings press release, BlackBerry CEO Thorsten Heins outlined the company’s near-term strategy: “Throughout the remainder of fiscal 2014, the company will invest in BlackBerry 10 smartphone launches, and the roll out of BlackBerry Enterprise Service 10, to continue to establish the new BlackBerry 10 platform in the marketplace.”
Will Blackberry ever build another tablet? If Heins can turn BB10 and its flagship phones into a success, then yes. But the signs are not promising. From the earnings statement:
“The smartphone market remains highly competitive, making it difficult to estimate units, revenue and levels of profitability ... Based on the competitive market dynamics and these investments, the company anticipates it will generate an operating loss in the second quarter.”
With this kind of fiscal outlook, it’s unlikely the company will invest heavily in new initiatives like rebooting its 7-inch tablet product line. 
So, PlayBook, it was nice knowing you. You were, in fact, impressive and innovative for your time. Your features like cards (at least on a tablet), swipe from bevel, true multitasking, wireless content sharing and more have all been copied by more successful mobile companies.
I guess you can take solace in that.

Friday, June 21, 2013

Video: Yesterday's WWC Cyber-Security Event Featuring U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security

Watch yesterday's Woodrow Wilson Center event on on Cyber-Security and public-private partnerships.

For a good, if now out-dated, recap on public-private partnerships & cyber-security, check out this Feb. 2011 article by Lawrence P. Farrell Jr.

Sequester's Bite: House Dem. Report Details U.S. Cutbacks to Critical Canada-U.S. Spending Priorities

BTBObserver shines light on a recent report documenting sequestration's impact on federal agencies, highlight cuts that affect the Canada-U.S. bilateral relationship:
The House Committee on Appropriations Democrats released a report detailing the considerable impact sequestration is having on important federal programs
Below are excerpts from the must-read report pertaining to the Canada-U.S. relationship:

Airport safety and wait times: …Sequestration reduced Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) FY 2013 appropriated dollars by approximately $600 million, which required CBP to reduce overtime for CBP Officers (CBPO) beginning in early March. These cuts have already led to significant increases in wait times at air ports of entry. (Page 5).

Overall, USCG expects to have approximately 20-50 percent fewer assets in the offshore patrol areas for migrant and drug interdiction at various times over the next several months. The Coast Guard expects to submit a reprogramming request in the next few weeks that will mitigate some of the impacts, but will likely not completely restore planned interdiction patrols. (Page 6).

Ports of Entry: As noted above, sequestration reduced Customs Border Protection Officer (CBPO) overtime availability at the Nation’s ports. This slows the movement of goods across the border and impedes U.S. capacity to facilitate and expedite cargo, adding costs to the supply chain and diminishing global competitiveness.

Land border truck wait times have increased significantly.
  • Del Rio and Mariposa both reported wait times of 120 minutes; normal wait times average 15 minutes for both locations.
  • Pharr Cargo reported wait times of 105 minutes; normal wait times average 15 minutes.
  • Detroit Fort Street Cargo reported wait times of 60 minutes; normal wait times average 5 minutes.
  • Other POEs with wait time increases: Nogales, Peace Bridge, Progreso, and Rainbow Bridge. (Pages 18-19).
Maritime cargo also faced delays: LA/Long Beach reported container release delays of 144 hrs (6 days) and Port Everglades and Miami Seaport reported container delays up to 48 hours. And cruise ships saw the effects of reduced CBPO overtime. Los Angeles and Port Everglades reported increased processing times of 6.5 hours; normal processing time is 4 hours.

Sequestration will also affect Border Patrol coverage between ports of entry, but DHS is still attempting to find additional savings. CBP expects to submit a reprogramming notification soon to mitigate some of these impacts and to prevent the need to furlough CBPOs for an estimated 3-4 days. (Pages 18-19).
Read the entire report here.

Tuesday, June 18, 2013

Canada Needs Three Arctic Ports - Fmr. Canadian Northern Forces Commander

The Hill Times offers this editorial from Pierre Leblanc, former Canadian Northern Forces commander and current President of Canadian Diamond Consultants, Inc., urging Canada to construct three Arctic ports:
Canada needs three ports in the Arctic: on its West Coast, in the centre of the archipelago, and on the East Coast.

There is near-unanimous agreement that the Arctic is warming at about twice the rate of global warming elsewhere. There is also clear evidence that the arctic polar ice cap is fast disappearing. Human activity in the Arctic is increasing exponentially as the Arctic becomes increasingly accessible. Maritime traffic has grown significantly.

The U.S. Coast Guard has reported that commercial maritime traffic through the Northern Sea Route along the Russian Coast increased tenfold between 2010 and 2012. Canada’s Northwest Passage was free of ice in 2007, years ahead of scientific predictions. It has been free of ice every summer since.

There is growing interest in harvesting the natural resources that have been shielded by the permanent polar ice cap. This will naturally lead to further increases in human activity and a greater incidence of search and rescue operations and maritime accidents. Such incidents could lead to an environmental catastrophe, in what is recognised as a very fragile environment with a short vertical food chain. Almost any major accident in the Arctic will affect the “human security” of its inhabitants.


Nunavut Premier Eva Aariak has stated that one of the anchors of sovereignty in the Canadian Arctic is having healthy communities. By investing and developing ports such as those proposed, the federal government could put concrete action behind Minister Leona Aglukkaq’s stated desire to develop the Arctic during Canada’s chairmanship of the Arctic Council. It would create a significant number of long term well-paying jobs for the communities in and around those ports. “Build a road and they will come” it is said. In the Canadian Arctic, ports will attract business. In so doing, Canada would also improve greatly its ability to deal with SAR [search and rescue] and marine pollution and meet its international commitments.